By Mark M. BelloDonald Trump is now deploying his Defense Secretary, the FBI, and the Department of Justice against six Democratic Members of Congress who produced a short video reminding military service members that they must refuse unlawful orders.
The problem? The “Seditious Six” said nothing even close to reaching a level of “sedition.” Aside from 1st Amendment protections, their words are almost a literal quote. From where, you ask?
U.S. military law!
Trump (as usual) has bastardized the law to “criminalize” speech he dislikes. And, it should be obvious to anyone reading this that the only person in this saga with a track record of seditious behavior is Trump.
First, though, a legal foundation:
The video in question restates a simple principle that’s drilled into every service member from day one:
An order is unlawful if it violates the Constitution, federal law, the UCMJ, or the Law of Armed Conflict — and military personnel are duty-bound to refuse it.
This isn’t fringe or insubordinate. It is straight out of military justice doctrine:
Manual for Courts-Martial: “A servicemember must obey lawful orders, but has a duty to disobey patently unlawful ones.” Under Nuremberg Principle IV, following orders does not excuse war crimes. Thus, to call the reaffirmation of that principle “sedition” is to call U.S. military law seditious. The only person here encouraging the military to ignore the Constitution is (you guessed it) Trump.
Trump claims the video amounts to a “death penalty” offense.
That’s nonsense.
18 U.S.C. § 2384 – Seditious Conspiracy requires:
The “Seditious Six” did none of this.
They didn’t call for violence or tell the military to stage a coup. They didn’t call for defiance of legal authority. They simply and professionally reminded servicemembers of their duty to follow the Constitution and not the ramblings of one vengeful, mean-spirited man. That speech is protected under the 1st Amendment and consistent with the language of the code of military ethics.
Bottom line? Trump’s legal claim is not merely weak. It’s fabricated.
While Trump screams “sedition,” let’s examine the track records of the people making these accusations:
Trump – The Only One Here Who Actually Tried to Overthrow the Government:
It is obscene for him to invoke sedition laws.
Bondi has:
Now she claims Congress is “encouraging a military coup”? She must leave politics immediately and try Broadway or another of the performing arts.
Hegseth, who loves to wrap himself in military symbolism, has:
He routinely undermines the non-political foundation of the U.S. military — and then dares accuse actual lawmakers of “sedition.”
Trump’s weaponization of military and federal law enforcement to target political opponents is a flashing red warning sign.
Calling constitutionally protected speech “sedition” is:
This is what autocrats do:
Declare political opposition a crime
Misuse the military
Control law enforcement
Twist patriotism into loyalty to a leader
Criminalize dissent
The “Seditious Six” are not the problem. Trump’s authoritarian impulse is.
Let’s compare the scenarios:
The “Seditious Six”:
Cited established military law
Encouraged loyalty to the Constitution
Exercised core First Amendment political speech
Encouraged the military to uphold its oath
Trump, Bondi, and Hegseth:
Attempted to overturn an election
Encouraged violence against Congress
Pressured the military to follow unlawful directives
Undermined the rule of law
Continue to attack the legitimacy of democratic institutions
Only one side here is aligned with democratic values. Only one has tried to overthrow the government. And only one poses a present and ongoing danger to constitutional governance.
Hint: it’s not the six members of Congress.
Trump’s accusations are not legal analyses. They are a psychological projection. The only “sedition” in this story occurred on January 6, 2021—and Trump, Bondi, and Hegseth were on the sidelines, cheering, excusing, or covering for it.
The video made by the “Seditious Six” is not a crime. It’s a warning — one the country desperately needs:
The military does not swear an oath to Donald Trump.
It swears an oath to the Constitution of the United States.
If Trump fears that principle, the problem is not the video.
The problem is Trump.

Mark M. Bello is an attorney and author of 9 Zachary Blake Legal Thrillers and other legal themed novels and children’s books. For more information, please visit https://www.markmbello.com