Rick “Loves New York in June” with an improvisation that in addition to Frank Sinatra also channels Fats Waller, Cecil Taylor and Igor Stravinsky while having a riveting conversation with mathematician and Game Changing Solution Maker Noah Healy (https://www.linkedin.com/in/noah-healy/) about his latest project to bring proper price discovery to the commodity markets while also exploring how these same ideas might also help JAZZforPEACE and its efforts to restore fairness and protection for artists in the music in history while continuing to bring Israelis and Palestinians together on the same side in protest against war.
Below is some additional information on Noah’s latest patent pending invention.
How does CDM link the financial compensation?Â
ANSWER: By measuring the precise amount of information each individual negotiating proposal contributed toward the common final outcome.
Does doing such linking alter the current perception of what people believe the stock is worth?
ANSWER: This isn’t a great fit for the equity markets though there are regulator changes that could support it. Short answer yes, the equities markets are dominated by fraudulent companies that aren’t sustainable CDM equities markets would probably crash the markets. Commodities would stabilize with greatly increased prices received by the producers.
Is it a software program that does this?
ANSWER: Yes, embedded in a marketplace likely delivered over the internet.
Can the software program do other things like create split payments for Artists and Publisher’s or collaborators of things such as a book or a musical work?
ANSWER: Single instance collaborations between small numbers of parties are better handled by just talking to each other. That said Entertainment has a lot of union/association agreements and using negotiation games to manage those agreements long term would eliminate the need for most of the executives in those organizations and likely eliminate strikes as a desirable tool while allowing compensation to respond flexibly to circumstantial changes to the industry.
Is it something you would click on to buy and sell a commodity or stock?
ANSWER: Essentially yes, there would be 3 options, buy, sell, negotiate future price. The trick is that in each case you are acting not simply on your behalf but as the amount you wish to join into the market aggregate role at the conditions that are currently and stably published.
If it was a patented and ready for use, what would it look like?Â
ANSWER: Very similar to existing market interfaces except prices would update about once per day, if useful it can go much faster or even slower. Fluctuations in price and distributions of price sentiment is where the current jagged line of prices over time would be instead.
Would it be an individual program that each person would purchase separately or would it be the actual underlying Technology of a trading exchange?
ANSWER: The tech is in the trading exchange. Users make transactions that they believe will profit them. Trading transactions are done in the present so the only way to lose while buying/selling is to be wrong about your current economic circumstances. Future price negotiations remain in the system until trades validate them but the committed capital is set with the initial transaction and there is no excess risk. An investment might be completely wrong and therefore worthless, but if any amount of correct information was present some payment will come back out of the system. Unless everyone negotiating was completely wrong the amount paid out will be greater then the amount invested by a large factor.
